IMA Membership Revoked – As WAS CEO Debbie Levitt Say's in blog post

While reportedly awaiting an apology from the BOD at the Internet Marketing Association to which she belonged, Debbie Levitt posted on her blog today that she has been summarily expelled from the IMA.

Without a warning first. Without any correspondence. Without any suggestions. Without a note from moderators.

Payment Details
Amount: $300.00 USD
Subject: ima dues
Note: membership dues refund cancellation of membership

from: As Was marketing hall of fame blog

Apparently Debbie received a partial refund via PayPal of her $599.00 Gold business membership package from the IMA. 

Readers will recall that Debbie Levitt of AS WAS became involved in a war of words between herself and IMA President Steve Grossberg on the IMA discussion forums.  Both sides report issues such as slander and IMA rules violations and it is our understanding that both parties were suspended from posting on the discussion forum for a period of days.  We know from Debbie Levitt's blog that she apologized for her infraction but we have no reports of Mr. Grossberg following suit.

Debbie Levitt is claiming several instances of slander and damage to her professional stature, she is indicating she will pursue legal remedy for same. 

On another note, a former board member at IMA recently posted a comment on the Trading Assistant Journal which indicated she advised the board to secure insurance against such actions but she was ignored.  Exposure to action is one of the main detraction's from becoming a board member in any organization. If the organization does not protect itself, or its officers from litigation it has been reported by other sources the legal exposure could reach personal and business assets.

We certainly hope the situation will not reach this level of litigious action, but if the Florida Attorney General is called to investigate, one could only imagine the numerous civil suits which could follow.

IMA Members Filing Complaints Against Internet Merchants Association with Florida Attorney General Economic Crimes Division

Florida Attorney General

A special meeting of the membership of the Internet Merchants Association was announced yesterday ( Sunday, July 6th, 2008 ). This meeting, called by and for the rank & file members of the association, scheduled to begin on July 10th, was to be held in a secure Internet conference format. 

According to the Association bylaws (as they existed at the time this meeting was called), there were no rules defined in the IMA rules to prevent a member meeting, special or otherwise, from taking place on the Internet or anywhere else.  The bylaws previously stated any meeting held must include attendance by 50% of the association membership, but the rules did not specifically preclude this or any meeting from occurring online.

That is, until late in the evening last night.

Apparently, from reports on this publication and others, the Board of Directors of the IMA called their own special meeting in the middle of last Sunday night.  In this special secret meeting of the BOD the rules for assembly were changed to prevent the aforementioned special meeting called by the membership from occurring.  Prior to last nights changing of the rules, the membership of the IMA could call a meeting anywhere, now after the changes made by three board members of the association, meetings must be held in person in the State of Florida.

Members of the IMA are concerned about a last minute change by the Board of Directors of the Internet Merchants Association of the Association bylaws apparently meant to prevent the membership from holding a meeting designed to be held on an Internet forum and presumably intended as a means to elect a new Board of Directors and President.

The membership believed the bylaws of the Association would allow such a meeting and that any new elections or actions which occurred during said meeting would be binding. This very well could have been true, until the rules were changed in the middle of the night.

The membership of the Internet Merchants Association reportedly live in several different States and countries. Presumably not all, or even half of the membership would not be available to travel to Florida for any special meeting held under circumstances of crisis such as has been recently reported at the IMA.

The latest reports and comments now openly call for the involvement of the Florida Attorney General in this matter.  Several members of the IMA have posted links and contact information for the Attorney Generals Offices in Florida, along with an outline of the basis of a complaint against the Board of Directors of the Internet Merchants Association. 

These members feel the last minute change of the bylaws, which now prevent the membership from meeting without the blessing of the BOD, has been an illegal act. Organizers of this official complaint want as many members of the IMA as possible to file complaints with the Economic Crimes Division of the Florida Attorney Generals Office in Tallahassee. 

The following is quoted from a comment posted on another site (And apparently on the IMA Discussion board). 

We now believe that it is in the best interest of the membership of the IMA to begin filing complaints with the Economic Crimes Division of the Florida Attorney Generals Office.

We want them to receive multiple complaints tomorrow. You can fill out the complaint report by going here:
[url]
http://myfloridalegal.com/Contact.nsf/Contact?OpenForm&Section=Economic_Crimes[/url]

The official address of the IMA is :

Internet Merchant Association
11792 Osprey Point Circle
Wellington, FL 33449-8367
phone: 561 615-1471

The three remaining Board members are:

Steve C. Grossberg
sgrossberg@budgetvideogames.com

Ben Mandell
ben@avianaorlando.com

Cathy Aggelopoulos
info@visibilityunlimited.com

Under question or comment, you should state that The Internet Merchants Association is a Florida Corporation.

The primary complaint is that a Special Meeting was called by the membership to be held online, since IMA members are located throughout the US, Canada and the United Kingdom. After the meeting was announced, the Board of Directors changed the bylaws regarding where the meeting could be conducted, in an attempt to stop the meeting. Please note in your complaint that 3 of the 6 remaining Board of Directors resigned from the organization in the last 4 days.

If you prefer, you can call the Florida Attorney Generals Office at 850-414-3300.

We need as many of you as possible to file this complaint. We believe the actions of the Board of Directors to be illegal, and need to make sure that we have multiple reports into the Florida Attorney Generals Office, so that it gets the appropriate attention.

Board of Directors and Moderators - Please note that any removal or modifications to this post may be legally considered as grounds for obstruction of justice.

 

Internet Merchants Association – IMA Special Meeting Called – Short Notice

Recently (Sunday - July 6th) information was added to the comments section of our recent article concerning the troubles within the board of directors at the IMA (Internet Merchants Association).  I thought this might be important enough to create a separate post regarding the meeting since it is such short notice. 

We seem to have become the unofficial comments section for many IMA members who disagree with the current leadership.  I do not have a problem with this but will warn that any comments deemed not suitable for public viewing may be removed (Just keep the language clean please).

Since many of the IMA members seem to regard our publication as a safe place to make their thoughts public I wanted to be sure everyone entitled to attend this special meeting could find the information here.

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF IMA

This special meeting is called to take place July 6,2008 and
commencing on July 10,2008. Please send this notice to all IMA
members. The meeting will take place at:

http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/imembers/

This notice brought to us from agenius-marketing.com

UPDATE:

Additional info found on agenius-marketing.com:

Reason for the meeting:

1. Because the IMA Board is now down to 3 members, we feel the Board
is crippled.
2. We also believe that there has been improper running of the
organization.
3. We need 114 members to login to enact the following rule:

………………..

A. We would like to take a vote on removing the Board and calling for a new election as proposed by others letting the Board run again if they like.

b. We would like to assign a committee of members to find an impartial
review panel for hire using up to $10,000 of the funds from the IMA’s
kitty (currently 78K). The review panel will review our bylaws for
issues and determine what they should say, privacy issues, what is
private and not private and other rules for running the organization
for the members by the members.

————————–

According to the Bylaws we can call this meeting with 114 members are present during it.(see below)

but if fifty percent (50%) of the voting members shall meet at any time and place, either within or without the State, and consent to the holding of a meeting, such meeting shall be valid without cause or notice, and at such meeting, any corporate action may be taken.

"As Was" Debbie Levitt Comments – Inside the Internet Merchants Association Debacle

I was wrong.  In my previous article about the IMA Board of Directors, I said I did not know anyone who was involved with the IMA or had any information about the internal workings of the board or ethics committee. It seems Debbie Levitt of AS WAS had intimate knowledge of the situation which developed causing a rift between the IMA board and it's own ethics committee commented upon in a previous article here on the Trading Assistant Journal

In a blog post recently, Debbie Levitt details her own set of problems with the board at the Internet Merchants Association.  It seems from Debbie's blog post (by reading between the lines), one could conclude the recent implosion at IMA had something to do with a war of words on the IMA discussion boards between Debbie Levitt and Steve Grosberg, President and Treasurer of the IMA. Debbie views the comments made by Steve Grossberg on the IMA board as libelous and simply reports in her blog that she is asking for an apology for same. Thus far, no apology has been proffered. Debbie has been suspended from posting on the discussion board at the IMA.

Most of my regular readers here will recall I was invited by Debbie Levitt to speak and arranged for Jay Berkowitz of the Ten Golden Rules to also speak at the inaugural Rocket Place (formerly The As Was ConferenceTAWC) conference in Orlando, Florida last April.  I know Debbie well and we have worked in the same circles for years. 

Read Debbie's version of the recent events and her interactions with the Board of Directors of the Internet Merchants Association as she experienced them here.

IMA Disbanding? – Discourse in the Ranks – Transparency Issues – What?

IMA_Logo

It has been reported in AuctionBytes today that the Internet Merchants Association is considering disbanding.

Ina's Steiner's article reveals information coming from within the IMA, this information details an internal rift between board members regarding "Back Room Deals", "Transparency" and Ethics.  Since I have no contacts within the IMA and I have had no accurate information to report regarding the workings of it's board, I will refrain from commenting about the specific facts or the problems reported in Ina Steiner's article. Auction Bytes has done a good job of reporting the news.

Here at the Trading Assistant Journal, we provide relevant commentary on the ecommerce and Internet trade business as a whole. As such a publication, I am inspired to ask one simple question regarding the public dispute within the board at the Internet Merchants Association.

What About The Members?

Has anyone on the board at the IMA considered how the "Internal Strife" and bickering on the board effects the rank & file member merchants who pay good money for a membership.  As a member of a trade organization purportedly offering value in the form of benefits, information, networking and education, is bickering and back room deal discussion considered as a benefit or education?

Do the board members at the IMA really think the membership is concerned with internal issues concerning "Back Room Deals" and "Transparency"?  Continue reading “IMA Disbanding? – Discourse in the Ranks – Transparency Issues – What?” »