My recent article: eBay Discussion Forums - A Dangerous Place to Dwell has stirred up a groundswell of opinion both from within and outside the eBay forums.
It seems that for a long time there have been two different kinds of eBay members, those who will be brave and venture into the forums for help or to socialize with other like minded eBay members and those who tried it before but will never go back.
I have experienced the good, no, very good people who dedicate themselves to helping others on the forums every day. I must also say I have endured the asinine and demeaning people who game the system and torment members with sarcastic and negative behavior on the very same eBay forums. For years I have attempted to ignore the latter and enjoy the former.
The eBay Discussion Forums - A Dangerous Place to Dwell article has brought many comments to this blog, both public and private.
Most of the public comments have been in agreement with the premise that the eBay forums are broken.
Some of the public comments have been less than appreciative, mostly due to my posting a video that they find offensive, a video which may name them as being part of the problem.
I can not reveal the content of the private comments, but please do not worry for my safety, I am sure they are only words....
Admittedly I do not know which names on the video are part of the problem and I never endorsed the publishing of names within the video. But these names are simply eBay member screen names which are basically anonymous and since so many members have multiple names, does it really matter if a name is included in a video on You Tube? I am sure John Donahoe and Lorrie Norrington's names are plastered from here to Timbuktu in videos on You Tube with less than flattering or inaccurate statements attached.
This morning two constructive comments were submitted to the article by two knowlegable eBay members, one an eBay solutions provider, the other an advanced eBay education specialist. I was answering these comments with a single reply and became so long winded in my response, I decided to make the entire interaction into a new blog post for today. So without further adieu... Here are todays star comments - Thanks Steve and Jamie!
“BTW–I see your point about not being the author of the video. However, by helping to disseminate it, you are tacitly agreeing to its content.”
I really don’t see where Scott is “tacitly agreeing to its content” at all. He has made that point several times.
I have stopped participating in the forums because I didn’t feel that it was a good use of my time. I am sure that only a small percentage of eBay users even know that the Forums exist, let alone use them.
For me the problem is, and confirmed in conversations with an eBay employee this week, is that the forums are old, outdated and unable to provide the sophisticated tools that online communities now desire.
- RSS feeds by thread
- RSS feeds for searches
- Search by ALL forums
- User Ratings
- Effective Report This Thread functionality
- Effective HTML options
- Polls (although I know why eBay would want to turn this off!)
At present the eBay boards are outdated and sadly quite pathetic for a company of it’s size. They work in the sense that they allow people to converse but beyond that they offer very little. For me to be able to search for themes across all the boards is a process of utter tediousness as I have to search board by board. Not good enough.
Two issues holding eBay back is
(a) the sheer volume of historical threads that would need to be migrated
(b) an effective and consistent moderation team in place.
@ Steve Kennedy and @ Vzaar Jamie
Thanks for your comments - both
-To Steve Kennedy-
I too only venture into the forums when someone sends me a specific thread they think I should read as to go there otherwise is a huge waste of time. One never knows whether the posts are placed in the forums by real people asking real questions or are planted off the wall comments meant to simply stir up trouble. I have seen people answer these very weird calls for help in an open and honest way with only good intentions and then be ridiculed for doing so by Feedies. I really never knew it was an organized game until recently, but this theory makes a great deal of sense.
Members having multiple persona's with multiple eBay screen names is a huge problem.
I myself have multiple eBay selling names for business purposes but I usually only use one name in the forums and it is attached to an actual live selling account. Maybe if eBay made members with multiple eBay screen names choose to only use one name in the forums, some of these shenanigans would cease. People are very bold when they think no one can find out who they are.
-To Vzaar Jamie-
eBay deletes thousands of forums posts (by mistake) on regular intervals without much fuss. So porting to a new system shouldn't be a problem in that regard.
As you know eBay outsourced the management of these forums to another company "Live World" back in 2001.
Apparently that management contract did not include a clause to update the system from time to time. It also is a mistake because many eBay members do not know the "Pinks" are not eBay employees. This would explain why the "Pinks" don't seem to know much about eBay and explain why they moderate the forums based upon rule books only, with no experiential or subjective management whatsoever.
Poor moderation is the key to this entire problem - as pointed out in my article.
Depending upon members with multiple screen names to self police the forums is just not an effective method of "pre-moderation" any longer. It may reduce manpower costs but in the end, with the most active members devising ways to game the moderation and control the boards with the tactics described in the article, it only serves to hurt eBays reputation both from a "Buyer Experience" and seller effectiveness standpoint.
Poor Buyer Experience
The eBay forums, combined with eBays notoriously poor communications system and help files adds a great deal to the poor buyer experience factor they claim to be eliminating with many of the recent changes imposed upon eBay sellers.
How can it be a good buyer experience when a new buyer stumbles into the "community" link and finds the "discussion forums" to ask a question that they could not get information about in the "help" section, only to encounter a "Feedie" or "Tool" or "Troll" who simply wants to play games with their question?
Most people simply give up and move on....
eBay was not built this way
Early on it was a friendly place with thousands of people helping new members understand the system through the discussion forums. This built a sence of community and commradity that has long since been removed from the equation at eBay. When one ventures off to other selling venues like onlineauction.com the difference on the discussion boards is palpable and refreshing. Many members at OLA repeat the initial feeling they get when in the forums at OLA as being "like eBay was back in the day".
Why can't eBay be like that again?
Would it be so difficult to actually clean up these forums and re-organize the system much has eBay has done in other areas? Community was the key to eBays early success and community brought with it the loyalty which allowed eBay to grow practically on auto pilot for nearly 10 years.
The auto pilot has been disengaged and the car is veering of the road.
Someone needs to take command of the ship and get it back on course. I think bringing eBay back to its roots, back to social marketing and networking, back to what made it all such a fantastic place in the beginning would be a much more effective fix than to eliminate checks and money orders as a payment option.